Already a failed system;
Call the FAA or the FCC?
Have you ever called the FAA or FCC? "Sorry, all available lines are busy... Please try your call again, later..."
The system is saturated... Cyberspace and the Telco networks are becoming saturated with DATA including smartphones being used for every other use like music videos, watching NetFlix, Youtube... you name it... All of that requires data bandwidth that loads down the network. Routers become congested and the data links slow wayyy... down. Hackers already make assaults on websites that saturate servers and shut down the sites. With Fed control of a site or sites that control drones, the sites can be "downed" by the Feds at the stroke of a few keys on a keyboard.
- Geowizard
Drone operators... ALERT ! New FAA rules
Moderator: chickenminer
-
- Mega Miner
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:18 pm
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Drone operators... ALERT ! New FAA rules
Privatization of monitoring and control;
The article above also mentions a private company that could (might) manage the monitoring of Drone flights. This has the faults and failings of the US Postal Service combined with cyber security breakdowns already seen in companies like SONY. Not to mention an already recently discovered embedded microcontrollers in flat panel displays with online access via your home wifi router that sends information to the largest country in Asia.
That's just for openers.
- Geowizard
The article above also mentions a private company that could (might) manage the monitoring of Drone flights. This has the faults and failings of the US Postal Service combined with cyber security breakdowns already seen in companies like SONY. Not to mention an already recently discovered embedded microcontrollers in flat panel displays with online access via your home wifi router that sends information to the largest country in Asia.
That's just for openers.
- Geowizard
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2018 8:50 pm
- Has thanked: 90 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Drone operators... ALERT ! New FAA rules
I really hate to agree with GeoWizard, but I am getting more and more convinced he is correct about alot of this.
-
- Mega Miner
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:18 pm
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Drone operators... ALERT ! New FAA rules
Marketing and profiling end users;
Thanks, Kodiak!
We know the largest microchip producers are located "offshore". What's the probability of an embedded microchip making a late night call using an available wifi signal anywhere there's a signal? Privacy policy? There is no such thing as ethics or privacy in the off shore tech biz. In fact, there are software and hardware engineers that lay awake at night devising new clandestine ways to extract information from end users. A wifi connected system of any kind, can dump information to an offshore link in microseconds and the data burst is over - "didn't happen".
Recent discoveries in wifi routers and "connected" devices have revealed this is fact not fiction.
A connected Drone is about as vulnerable as it gets.
- Geowizard
Thanks, Kodiak!
We know the largest microchip producers are located "offshore". What's the probability of an embedded microchip making a late night call using an available wifi signal anywhere there's a signal? Privacy policy? There is no such thing as ethics or privacy in the off shore tech biz. In fact, there are software and hardware engineers that lay awake at night devising new clandestine ways to extract information from end users. A wifi connected system of any kind, can dump information to an offshore link in microseconds and the data burst is over - "didn't happen".
Recent discoveries in wifi routers and "connected" devices have revealed this is fact not fiction.
A connected Drone is about as vulnerable as it gets.
- Geowizard
-
- Mega Miner
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:18 pm
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Drone operators... ALERT ! New FAA rules
Market Share;
In the free-enterprise system, companies work to increase their share of the market. Not surprisingly, they want a bigger piece of the pie!
Drone manufacturers are no exception.
One of the means of dominance in the market is through effecting "paradigm shifts" that happen to improve their position in the market place. For example; It has been known for some time that "officials/agencies" have expressed concern for the "safe operation" of drones. That created a shift toward regulation of who and where drones may be operated in the interest of "public safety". These factors have lead to further discussion between leading drone manufacturers and the Fed's to establish "controls" and/or monitoring. The leading drone manufacturers stepped up to the table with their ideas of how they might contribute to providing a solution!
The Feds come in with a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that is extreme with the understanding that passage of a LESS restrictive set of rules will be easier for the public to digest! The public is given an reasonable opportunity to respond. Its all done reasonably to avoid the sensation of having Federal Rule making shoved down your throat.
Ultimately a company such as the one at the opening of this topic become a "partner" with the Feds on a soft approach to increasing Government control and breaching privacy while achieving market dominance. All represented as a win - win for them and the public. See, we spoke up and the Feds softened the rules!
- Geowizard
In the free-enterprise system, companies work to increase their share of the market. Not surprisingly, they want a bigger piece of the pie!
Drone manufacturers are no exception.
One of the means of dominance in the market is through effecting "paradigm shifts" that happen to improve their position in the market place. For example; It has been known for some time that "officials/agencies" have expressed concern for the "safe operation" of drones. That created a shift toward regulation of who and where drones may be operated in the interest of "public safety". These factors have lead to further discussion between leading drone manufacturers and the Fed's to establish "controls" and/or monitoring. The leading drone manufacturers stepped up to the table with their ideas of how they might contribute to providing a solution!
The Feds come in with a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that is extreme with the understanding that passage of a LESS restrictive set of rules will be easier for the public to digest! The public is given an reasonable opportunity to respond. Its all done reasonably to avoid the sensation of having Federal Rule making shoved down your throat.
Ultimately a company such as the one at the opening of this topic become a "partner" with the Feds on a soft approach to increasing Government control and breaching privacy while achieving market dominance. All represented as a win - win for them and the public. See, we spoke up and the Feds softened the rules!
- Geowizard
-
- Mega Miner
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 4:18 pm
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Drone operators... ALERT ! New FAA rules
Smart phones;
What we know...
Smart phones with the requisite Apps have become the technology of choice for control of Drones. Drones can transmit live video images using wifi.
It doesn't take much imagination to devise apps that include a larger degree of functionality. Drone manufacturers would actually prefer to (and often do) "lock customers" into the use of their apps. The apps provide routine software updates to "improve performance". Better yet, the app becomes an integrated functional part of the operation of the drone.
After-market revenue on drones;
The drone will not function without the app. The "up side" is that for a small subscription fee, you may enjoy the benefits of having a high performance drone. Software in the form of apps may have an expiration date based on the design that expires after the free "trial offer period", or other arbitrary set point in time. Connected drones are vulnerable to the often aggressive after-market strategies imposed by the manufacturer.
In summary, it's best to select a drone that is all-inclusive with it's own controller having no more than a wifi link between the controller and the drone.
- Geowizard
What we know...
Smart phones with the requisite Apps have become the technology of choice for control of Drones. Drones can transmit live video images using wifi.
It doesn't take much imagination to devise apps that include a larger degree of functionality. Drone manufacturers would actually prefer to (and often do) "lock customers" into the use of their apps. The apps provide routine software updates to "improve performance". Better yet, the app becomes an integrated functional part of the operation of the drone.
After-market revenue on drones;
The drone will not function without the app. The "up side" is that for a small subscription fee, you may enjoy the benefits of having a high performance drone. Software in the form of apps may have an expiration date based on the design that expires after the free "trial offer period", or other arbitrary set point in time. Connected drones are vulnerable to the often aggressive after-market strategies imposed by the manufacturer.
In summary, it's best to select a drone that is all-inclusive with it's own controller having no more than a wifi link between the controller and the drone.
- Geowizard